VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Sarath Babu v. The State Rep .By Its the Inspector of Police

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
11 June 2026
Bench
G.K. Ilanthiraiyanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 14696/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow G.K. Ilanthiraiyan

Judgment

ORDER The petitioners, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on

03.08.2025 for the alleged offence under Sections 20(b)(ii)(c), 24 of NDPS Act, 1985 in Crime No.200 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. Page2 of 4

¶2The case of the prosecution is that based on the secret information the respondent police went to the scene of occurrence and found that the petitioner along with other accused persons involved in illegal transportation of 350 kgs of ganja. Hence, this case.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that there is no recovery from this petitioner and only based on the confession statement the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 03.08.2025 and he is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶4The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Crl Side) would submit that the petitioner is also a part of a network operating from Andhra Pradesh to Sri Lanka, involved in the possession, transportation and sale of ganja. He further submitted that this is the third bail petition and the earlier bail petitions filed by the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.29975 of 2026 and Crl.O.P.No.2498 of 2026 was dismissed by this Court on 04.11.2025 and 04.02.2026 respectively. Hence, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner. Page3 of 4

¶5Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6.Considering the facts of the case and nature of offence and the quantity involved in this case is 406 kgs which is a very huge quantity and the petitioner failed to satisfy twin conditions under section 37 of NDPS Act and this is the third bail petition and the earlier bail petitions filed by the petitioner was dismissed by this Court, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed.

¶7Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 11-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order SMN To.

¶1The Inspector of police Town police Station,Karaikal,

¶2The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras CRLoOPoNo.o14696oofo2026 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN,oJ. SMN CRLoOPoNo.o14696oofo2026 11-06-2026 Page4oofo4

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN Sarath Babu S/o.Rajendran, No. 29, Velathigananibenta, Arimanibenta Post, Vaniyambadi Taluk, Thiruppathur district. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep .by its The Inspector of police Town police Station, Karaikal, Puducherry, Crime No. 200/2025 ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This Criminal Original petition is filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 to release the petitioner on bail in Crime No.200 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, Town Police Station, Karaikal, Puducherry. For Petitioner(s): M/S. R.Muruga Bharathi For Respondent(s): MS.G.DJEARANY, GOVT.ADVOCATE (PUDUCHERRY)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.