- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 5 June 2026
- Bench
- Anita Sumanth, Sunder Mohan
- Case no.
- WP Crl. 1046/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow Anita SumanthFollow Sunder Mohan
Judgment
ORDER (Order of the Court was made by Sunder Mohan J.) The brother of the convict prisoner aggrieved by the order rejecting the request for grant of ordinary leave, has filed this petition.
¶2The petitioner's brother viz., Kumar, S/o.Periyannan, aged 40, years, was convicted for the major offence under Section 302 of the IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment and he is undergoing imprisonment, admittedly, for more than twelve years. By the impugned order, the respondents have rejected the request for leave on the ground that the reasons for leave are not true.
¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the convict prisoner's mother is aged about 78 years and his presence is required for making arrangements for their livelihood and also for meeting his aged mother, who requires continuous medical treatment.
¶4The learned counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side), appearing for the respondents per contra submitted that though the convict prisoner is eligible for leave, the Probation Officer found that the reasons stated were not true; and that there is no reason to interfere with the impugned order. 5 It is not in dispute that the convict prisoner's mother is aged about 78 years. In fact, the Probation Officer has recorded in his report that the convict prisoner's mother had taken treatment in the year 2025.
¶6In view of the admitted fact that the convict prisoner's mother is 78 years old and had already suffered an ailment, we are of the view that the respondents are not justified in rejecting the request of the petitioner. That apart, the other reason for rejection is that there is likely to be a law and order problem, if the convict prisoner is released. In fact, this Court had earlier granted 21 days ordinary leave to the convict prisoner in WP No.38866 of 2024 by order dated 07.01.2025 and no complaint of any threat to the convict prisoner was reported.
¶7Hence, we are inclined to grant Ordinary Leave to the convict prisoner without escort for a period of 21 days commencing from
08.06.2026.
¶8(i) The respondents are directed to release the convict viz., Kumar, S/o.Periyannan, aged 40, years, confined at Central Prison, Vellore, on ordinary leave for a period of twenty one (21) days without escort i.e., from 08.06.2026 to 28.06.2026.
(ii)The convict shall be released on 08.06.2026 at 10.00 A.M. and is directed to surrender before the Superintendent of Prisons, Central Prison, Vellore, on 29.06.2026 before 10.00 A.M.
(iii)The convict shall report before the Annathanapatty Police Station, once in a week, i.e., on every Monday at 10.30 A.M, during the period of leave.
(iv)During the leave period, the Convict Prisoner shall abide by all the conditions prescribed in the Jail Manual. Connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. (A.S.M.,J.) (S.M.,J.) 05-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Issue order copy today. ars To
¶1The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons, Whannels Road, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.
¶2The Superintendent of Prisons Central Prison-1, Vellore.
¶3The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J. AND
SUNDER MOHAN, J. ars 05-06-2026 W.P. Crl.No.1046 of 2026 and WPMP.Crl.No.345 of 2026
Dr. ANITA SUMANTH, J. and SUNDER MOHAN
, J.
(Order of the Court was made by SUNDER MOHAN, J.) This matter is listed under the caption 'for being mentioned'.
¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the name of the convict was mentioned wrongly in the affidavit filed by her, as a result, the order passed on 05.06.2026 also mentioned the same.
¶3In light of the above, paragraph Nos.2 and 8 of order dated
05.06.2026 is modified to read as follows:
¶2The petitioner's brother viz., Arulmurugan, S/o.Periyannan, was convicted for the major offence under Section 302 of the IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment and he is undergoing imprisonment, admittedly, for more than twelve years. By the impugned order, the respondents have rejected the request for leave on the ground that the reasons for leave are not true.
¶8(i) The respondents are directed to release the convict viz., Arulmurugan, S/o.Periyannan, confined at Central Prison, Vellore, on ordinary leave for a period of
Dr. ANITA SUMANTH, J. and SUNDER MOHAN
, J.
twenty one (21) days without escort i.e., from 10.06.2026 to
30.06.2026.
(ii)The convict shall be released on 10.06.2026 at 10.00 A.M. and is directed to surrender before the Superintendent of Prisons, Central Prison, Vellore, on 01.07.2026 before 10.00 A.M.
(iii)The convict shall report before the Annathanapatty Police Station, once in a week, i.e., on every Monday at 10.30 A.M, during the period of leave.
(iv)During the leave period, the Convict Prisoner shall abide by all the conditions prescribed in the Jail Manual.
¶4Barring the aforesaid changes, order dated 05.06.2026 remains unaltered. [A.S.M, J.] [S.M, J.]
09.06.2026 sl Note: Issue today. W.P. Crl.No.1046 of 2026 and WPMP.Crl.No.345 of 2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN and WMP Crl.No.345 of 2026 Kumar ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons, Whannels Road, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008. 2. The Superintendent of Prisons Central Prison-1, Vellore. ..Respondent(s) PETITION filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records in the order No.RO-VLR/111/2026-CAMP(A) dated 26-03-2026 passed by respondent No.2 and quashing the same, and directing the respondents to grant 28 days ordinary leave for the petitioner's brother namely Kumar, S/o.Periyannan, aged 40 years Convict Prisoner, PID 28770, Central Prison, Vellore. For Petitioner(s): Ms.S.Nadhiya For Respondent(s): Mr. C.R. Malarvannan Counsel for Government Of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.