VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

Lalitha v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
22 July 2025
Bench
M. Sundarauthor, Hemant Chandangoudar
Case no.
WP 26699/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow M. SundarFollow Hemant Chandangoudar

Judgment

O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by M. SUNDAR, J.] Captioned matter turns on a very narrow compass.

¶2Short facts are that R5 (private respondent) come to this Court with a 'Removal of Encroachment' {'RoE'} prayer vide W.P.No.12115 of 2024; that this writ petition came to be disposed of by a Division Bench vide order dated 07.06.2024 to which one of us (M.Sundar J.,) was a party and that thereafter, R5 filed a contempt being Contempt Petition No.3723 of 2024 which was closed recording the stated position that Revenue Divisional Officer has passed an 'order dated 13.03.2025 bearing reference Page Nos.2/4 Na.Ka.No.05/2025/Ci' {hereinafter 'said order' for the sake of brevity, convenience and clarity}. A soft copy of said order has been served on the learned counsel for writ petitioner today and learned counsel for writ petitioner confirms receipt of the same.

¶3All questions raised in the captioned WP are left open as regards the writ petitioner as well as R5 as the writ petitioner now wants to assail the said order. All rights and contentions of the writ petitioner including the contentions raised in the main WP are preserved for this purpose.

¶4We make it clear that this order will not impact the rights of R5 in any manner therefore, notice to private respondent (R5) is dispensed with and the main WP is taken up with the consent of learned counsel for writ petitioner and learned State counsel in the Admission Board itself. Page Nos.3/4 M.SUNDAR, J., and HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J., mk Captioned WP and captioned WMP thereat disposed of as closed albeit with preservation of rights as already alluded to supra. There shall be no order as to costs. (M.S.J.,) (H.C.J.,)

22.07.2025 Index : Yes / No Speaking / Non-speaking mk To

¶1The District Collector Chengalpattu District.

¶2The District Revenue Officer Chengalpattu District Chengalpattu - 603 002.

¶3The Revenue Divisional Officer Chairperson - Divisional Monitoring Committee Chengalpattu District.

¶4The Tahsildar Madurandagam Taluk Madurandagam - 603 306. Page Nos.4/4

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 22.07.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR and W.M.P.No.30025 of 2025 Lalitha W/o.R.Dharuman ... Petitioner vs. 1. The District Collector Chengalpattu District. 2. The District Revenue Officer Chengalpattu District Chengalpattu - 603 002. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Chairperson - Divisional Monitoring Committee Chengalpattu District. 4. The Tahsildar Madurandagam Taluk Madurandagam - 603 306. 5. B.Sagadevan S/o.Bagavatham ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India Page Nos.1/4 seeking a writ of Mandamus, to direct the third respondent to convene Divisional Monitoring Committee and conduct fair enquiry by considering the objections of the petitioner after giving the opportunity of personal hearing by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 06.01.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Mugunthan For Respondents : Mr.T.K.Saravanan Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R4 *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.