P.Vanitha v. K.Palanisamy(Died)1.P.Janakiraman

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-02-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL AS Nos. 300 and 301 of 2024 A.S.No.300 of 2024

¶1P.Vanitha

¶2Lakshmi Appellant(s) Vs K.PALANISAMY(DIED) .P.Janakiraman

2.N.Ramalingam Respondent(s) AS No. 301 of 2024

1.Lakshmi

2.P.Vanitha Appellant(s) Vs P.Janakiraman Respondent(s) PRAYER in

AS No. 300 of 2024:

Appeal suit filed under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the Judgment and decree dated 31.08.2023 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Salem in O.S.No.90 of 2013. PRAYER in

AS No. 301 of 2024:

Appeal suit filed under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the Judgment and decree dated 31.08.2023 passed by the Learned Principal District Judge, Salem in O.S.No.17 of 2014 and thus render justice. In both appeal suits For Appellant(s): P.Jagadeesan For Respondent(s): Mr.V.Sekar COMMON JUDGMENT (Judgment was delivered by N.Sathish Kumar J.) Appeal in A.S.No.300 of 2024 has been filed as against the decree and judgment of the Trial Court in O.S.No.90 of 2013 dismissing the suit filed for partition and the appeal in A.S.No.301 of 2024 has been filed as against the decree and judgment of the Trial Court in O.S.No.17 of 2014 decreeing for declaration and also for permanent injunction.

¶2During the pendency of the appeal suits, the appellants and the respondents in both cases have entered into compromise setting the disputes between them and seeks that these appeal suits may be dismissed as withdrawn as settled out of Court.

¶3Today, the appellants and the respondent(s) in both cases are present and they are identified by their respective counsel. They have produced a joint memo of compromise, wherein, it is stated that the respondent P.Janakiraman has paid a total sum of Rs.55 lakhs to the appellants, out of which, Rs.30 lakhs was received by the first appellant and Rs.25 lakhs was received by the second appellant. The details of demand drafts to the first appellant are DD.Nos.607610 dated 06.02.2026 for Rs.5 lakhs, D.D.No.607608 dated 05.02.2026 for Rs.10 lakhs and D.D.No.607587 dated 18.12.2025 for Rs.15 lakhs (all the demand drafts were drawn on Canara Bank, Gorimedu Branch at Salem. Similarly, details of demand drafts to the second appellant are DD.Nos.607588 dated 18.12.2025 for Rs.10 lakhs, D.D.No.060420 dated

09.02.2026 for Rs.10 lakhs and D.D.No.060419 dated 09.12.2026 for Rs.15 lakhs (all the demand drafts were drawn on Canara Bank, Gorimedu Branch at Salem). The said joint memo of compromise is taken on record.

¶4Accordingly, these appeal suits are dismissed as settled out of Court. The said joint memo of compromise shall form part of the decree. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions stand closed. (N.SATHISH KUMAR J.)(R.SAKTHIVEL J.) 10-02-2026 dhk Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes N.SATHISH KUMAR J. AND R.SAKTHIVEL J. dhk To

¶1The Principal District Judge Principal District Court, Salem

¶2The Section Officer VR Section, Madras High Court AND AS NO. 301 OF 2024 10-02-2026