VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Ms Yellow Capsicum v. The Deputy State Tax Officer

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
25 March 2026
Bench
C. Saravananauthor
Case no.
WP 11393/2026

Judgment

ORDER Mr.C.Harsharaj, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the Respondent.

¶2This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader for the Respondent.

¶3The learned counsel for the Petitioner fairly concedes that the Petitioner will deposit 50% of the disputed tax confirmed by the impugned order as a condition for denovo adjudication and the amount confirmed by the impugned order. However, he would submit that the Petitioner has closed down the business as early as 03.06.2021 and he is currently employed. He would further submit that the Petitioner may be given adequate time to pre-deposit the aforesaid amount as a condition for denovo adjudication and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.

¶4The learned counsel for the Petitioner has also made the following endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle which has been extracted hereunder:- "Agreed to deposit 50% on tax amount within 6 Page3 of 6 months"

¶5Recording the above consent given by the Petitioner, the case is remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order on merits subject to the Petitioner depositing 50% of the disputed tax in cash or from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of six (6) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶8Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 21.05.2024 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated

16.08.2024 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 21.05.2024.

¶9In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply/pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner if any, shall also stand automatically vacated.

¶10It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the Petitioner depositing 50% of the disputed tax as ordered above and the Page4 of 6 Petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount for any other tax period barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order.

¶11In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.

¶12Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner.

¶13This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Consequently connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 25-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order GBI Page5 of 6 To The Deputy State Tax officer Porur Assessment circle No.4/109, I Floor, Bangalore Highway Road Varadharjapuram Nazaratpet chennai-600 123 WPoNo.o11393oofo2026 C.SARAVANAN,oJ. GBI WPoNo.o11393oofo2026 and WMPoNos.12393o&o12395oofo2026 25-03-2026 Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and WMP Nos.12393 & 12395 of 2026 Ms Yellow Capsicum Rep by its proprietor Shri.Arun GSTIN.33ARJPA8779N2Z4, No. 4/24, Vivekanandhar Street, Ponni Nagar, Chennai 600 116 ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Deputy State Tax officer Porur Assessment circle No.4/109, I Floor, Bangalore Highway Road Varadharjapuram Nazaratpet chennai-600 123 ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to passing of the impugned exparte Order bearing GSTIN 33ARJPA8779N2Z4/2019-20 along with DRC 07 with reference no. ZD330824133036N dated 16.08.2024 passed by the Respondent and quash the same as the same being arbitrary, illegal and passed in violation of Section 75 and Section 169 of the CGST/TNGST Act, 2017 and Articles 14, 19 (1) (g) and 265 of the Constitution of India. For Petitioner(s): Mr.G Natarajan For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Harsharaj Special Government Pleader Page2 of 6

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.