VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

M/S. New Nagoorar Rice Mundy v. The State Tax Officer

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
18 March 2026
Bench
C. Saravananauthor
Case no.
WP 10760/2026

Judgment

O R D E R Mr.T.N.C.Kaushik, learned Additional Government Pleader, accepts notice for the respondent.

¶2This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the time of admission with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the Respondent.

¶3In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned Order

in

Form

GST

DRC-07

bearing

Ref.No. GSTIN:33AZPPM0218E1ZO/2021-2022 dated 03.10.2025 of the Respondent, which was preceded by a Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 04.06.2025, wherein the Petitioner was also called upon to file a reply and to appear for personal hearing. However, the Petitioner did not take advantage of the same and has thus suffered the impugned Order dated 03.10.2025.

¶4The Petitioner was also issued with Reminders on 25.08.2025,

04.09.2025 and 13.09.2025, which called upon the Petitioner to file a reply and to appear for a personal hearing. Thereafter, the petitioner filed a detailed reply dated 26.09.2025.

¶5It is noticed that the limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017 against the impugned Order has already expired. The present Writ Petition has been filed only on

13.03.2026.

¶6At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is willing to pre-deposit 25% of the disputed tax as a condition for de novo adjudication.

¶7The learned counsel for the petitioner has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle, which is extracted hereunder: "I am willing to deposit 25% of the tax."

¶8Recording the above consent given by the petitioner, the case is remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order subject to the Petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax in cash from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶9Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 04.06.2025 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated 03.10.2025 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated

04.06.2025 .

¶10In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply / pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner shall also stand automatically vacated.

¶11It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the deposit of 25% of the disputed tax as ordered above and the Petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount for any other tax period barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order.

¶12In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.

¶13Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner.

¶14This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

18.03.2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No mk C.SARAVANAN, J mk To Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) Krishnagiri – 2 Assessment Circle Collector Office Back Side Krishnagiri, Tamil Nadu.

18.03.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 18.03.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.11684 and 11685 of 2026 M/s.New Nagoorar Rice Mundy Represented by its Proprietor Mr.Mohammed Usanar No.43, TVN Road, Ulundurpettai Villupuram, Tamil Nadu – 606 107 GSTIN : 33AZPPM0218E1ZO ... Petitioner Vs. The State Tax Officer Office of the Commercial Tax Officer Villupuram II Jurisdiction Cuddalure Tamil Nadu. ... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying to issuance of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the respondent herein in its impugned order in GSTIN:33AZPPM0218E1ZO/2021-2022 dated 03.10.2025 along with the consequential order in Form DRC-07 bearing reference No.ZD331025007754R dated 03.10.2025 for the period 2021-22 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Ms.R.Hemalatha For Respondent : Mr.T.N.C.Kaushik Additional Government Pleader *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.