VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Tvl. Aki and Co v. Commercial Tax Officer / State Tax Officer

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
24 March 2026
Bench
C. Saravananauthor
Case no.
WP 11218/2026

Judgment

ORDER K.Vasanthamala, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondent. Page2 of 6

¶2This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the Respondent.

¶3In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned Order dated 14.10.2025, whereby, the proposal in Show Cause Notice dated

23.05.2025 issued under Section 73 of the Tax Period from April 2021-March-2022 has been confirmed.

¶4It is noticed that the limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017 against the impugned Order has already expired. The present Writ Petition has been filed only on 17.03.2026.

¶5The learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the Petitioner may be given an opportunity to establish the case by remitting the case back to the respondent. The learned counsel for the Petitioner further submits that as against the total demand of Rs.04,08,420/- (Rs.2,04,210/- each) towards the SGST Tax Liability has been recovered from the Petitioner Electronic Credit Ledger on

12.01.2026. In support of the same, the learned counsel for the Petitioner has also drawn an attention to extract the Electronic Credit Ledger, which primafacie indicates that part of the tax liability has been confirmed, the petitioner shall deposit 25% of the disputed tax as a condition for denovo adjudication. Page3 of 6

¶6The learned counsel for the Petitioner has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle, which is extracted hereunder:- " It is submitted that the SGSTportion of the tax demand Rs.2,04,210/- has been recovered on 12.01.2025 by debiting the ECL. Petitioner undertakes to deposit 25% of the tax liability, if Dept is unable to verify. The amount already recovered may be adjusted towards 25% pre deposit"

¶7Recording the above consent, the case is remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order on merits subject to the Petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax in cash or from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶8Needless to state, any amount recovered from the Petitioner, towards the tax Liability confirmed vide impugned order, shall be adjusted towards the aforesaid pre-deposit of 25% as ordered above.

¶9Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 23.05.2025 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated

14.10.2025 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 23.05.2025. Page4 of 6

¶10In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply/pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner if any, shall also stand automatically vacated.

¶11It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the Petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax as ordered above and the Petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount for any other tax period barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order.

¶12In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.

¶13Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner. Page5 of 6

¶14This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Consequently, the Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 24-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Vv To Commercial Tax Officer / State Tax Officer Sankari Circle, Sankari, Namakkal, Salem WPoNo.o11218oofo2026 C.SARAVANANoJ. Vv WPoNo.o11218oofo2026 and WMPoNos.o12223ooando12224oofo2026 24-03-2026 s Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and WMP Nos. 12223 and 12224 of 2026 Tvl. AKI and Co Rep by its Managing Partner 10-175 Vanichampatti, Desavillaku Chinnappampatti Post Omalur Salem 636 306 ..Petitioner Vs Commercial Tax Officer / State Tax Officer Sankari Circle , Sankari, Namakkal, Salem ..Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India tp issue to a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the entire records relating to the impugned order in Reference No. ZD331025140483U dated 14.10.2025 passed by the Respondent along with annexures and quash the same. For Petitioner: Ms.R.Sri Visvapriya For Respondent: Mrs.K.Vasanthamala Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.