VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Victory Engineering Company v. The Assistant Commissioner(St)(Fac)

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
12 March 2026
Bench
C. Saravananauthor
Case no.
WP 9287/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow C. Saravanan

Judgment

ORDER Mrs.P.Selvi, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondent.

¶2This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the time of admission with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the Respondent.

¶3The Petitioner is before this Court against the impugned Order bearing Reference No.ZD330424189857V in FORM GST DRC-07 dated

24.04.2024 whereby the proposal in Show Cause Notice dated 02.05.2023 issued for the Tax Period April 2018-March 2019 has been confirmed. In absence of a reply to the Show Cause Notice, the demand has been confirmed on account of belated availing of Input Tax Credit under Section 16(4) of the respective GST Enactments which now stands condoned by virtue of insertion of Section 16(5) and Section 16(6) to the respective GST Enactments inserted by Finance (No.2) Act, 2024 (15 of 2024) dated

16.08.2024 with effect from 27.09.2024 vide SO 4253(E) with retrospective effect from 01.07.2017. By virtue of statutory intervention, the credit that was availed belatedly has been cured subject to certain condition.

¶4Even if the Petitioner has not complied with the above condition i.e., filing of reply to the Show Cause Notice, the Petitioner is entitled to avail Input Tax Credit subject to the Petitioner filing requisite documents to establish that the Petitioner had indeed received interest on which Input Tax Credit was availed belatedly.

¶5Considering the same, this case is remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Subject to the Petitioner complying the above stipulation, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner shall also stand automatically vacated.

¶6This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

12.03.2026 arb To: The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC), Kundrathur Assessment Circle, 4/109, 1st Floor, Bangalore-Chennai Highway, Varadharajapuram, Nazarathpet, Chennai – 600 123.

C.SARAVANAN, J. arb and W.M.P.Nos.9998 and 10000 of 2026

12.03.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 12.03.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.9998 and 10000 of 2026 Victory Engineering Company, Represented by its Partner G.Chandrasekaran ... Petitioner Vs. The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC), Kundrathur Assessment Circle, 4/109, 1st Floor, Bangalore-Chennai Highway, Varadharajapuram, Nazarathpet, Chennai – 600 123. ... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the Impugned Order in FORM GST DRC-07 bearing Reference Number ZD330424189857V dated 24.04.2024, passed by the Respondent herein, to quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Shivakumar For Respondent : Mrs.P.Selvi Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.