VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Sivagami Saravanan v. The Commercial Tax Officer

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
13 March 2026
Bench
C. Saravananauthor
Case no.
WP 9536/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow C. Saravanan

Judgment

ORDER Mrs.P.Selvi, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondent.

2.This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the time of admission with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the Respondent.

3.The petitioner is before this Court against the impugned order dated

29.12.2022 in Form GST DRC-07 for the tax period 2019-2020 passed under Section 73 of the respective GST Enactments which was preceded by a Show Cause Notice in DRC-01 dated 28.11.2022.

4.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned order is challenged primarily on the ground that a copy of the detailed assessment order dated 29.12.2022 on the ground that it has not been uploaded.

5.It is noticed that the demand proposal in Show Cause Notice in DRC-01 dated 28.11.2022 is on account of belatedly availing of Input Tax Credit. The Show Cause Notice proposed not only to recover the tax but also interest under Section 50(1) of the respective GST Enactments.

6.According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner has already deposited the tax liability for the aforesaid tax period on 20.03.2021 viz., even before the passing of the impugned order which has not been captured in the impugned order.

7.Have considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the respondent.

8.The issue regarding belated availing of Input Tax Credit under Section 16(4) of the respective GST Enactments is now answered in favour of the petitioner in terms of the statutory intervention by way of insertion of Section 16(5) and 16(6) to the respective GST Enactments by Finance (No.2) Act, 2024 (15 of 2024) dated 16.08.2024 vide SO 4253 (E) with retrospective effective from 01.07.2017.

9.In view of the aforesaid statutory intervention, the impugned order is quashed and the case is remitted back to the respondent to pass fresh order on merits, and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

10.The petitioner shall file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in DRC-01 dated 28.11.2022 within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order in view of the order passed in this writ petition and order passed in WP.No.9532 of 2026 dated 13.03.3026.

11.The attachment to the petitioner's bank account shall stand vacated subject to the petitioner complying with the order in W.P.No.9532 of 2026 stipulated.

12.This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 13-03-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes kp To The Commercial Tax Officer Sholinganallur Assessment Circle Integrated Commercial Taxes and Reg., Dept., 2nd Floor, Room No.240, Nandanam, Chennai-600 035. C.SARAVANAN J kp

13.03.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and WMP Nos.10272 & 10273 of 2026 Sivagami Saravanan Sole Proprietor of Tvl. Dayavu Engineering Enterprises, No. 29, 4th Street, Sakthi Nagar, Thoraipakkam, Chennai, - 600097 Petitioner(s) Vs The Commercial Tax Officer Sholinganallur Assessment Circle Integrated Commercial Taxes and Reg., Dept., 2nd Floor, Room No.240, Nandanam, Chennai-600 035 Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records in Reference No. ZD331222121938K dated 29.12.2022 u/s.73 of the TNGST Act, 2017 along with a summary of the order dated 29.12.2022 in Reference No. ZD331222121938K on the file of the Respondent relating to F.Y.2019-2020 and quash the same For Petitioner (s) : Mrs.N. Janani For Respondent (s) : Mrs.P.Selvi Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.