VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

R.Muthusamy v. The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
27 March 2025
Bench
C.V. Karthikeyanauthor
Case no.
WP 9398/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow C.V. Karthikeyan

Judgment

O R D E R This writ petition has been filed for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to release the petitioner's balance retiral benefits like pension/provisional pension, gratuity, balance special provident fund and admissible interest within the stipulated time.

¶2In the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, it had been stated that the petitioner was initially appointed as Field Surveyor on

01.09.1987 and his services were regularised with effect from that date. He had been subsequently promoted finally to the selection grade post of Sub Inspector of Surveyor with effect from 26.04.2001. The petitioner was dismissed from service by an order dated 28.06.2004. However the petitioner had questioned that particular order and the writ petition filed by the petitioner was allowed and the writ appeal filed by the respondents was dismissed.

¶3It is fairly stated on behalf of the respondents that now the petitioner is eligible to be paid the balance amount retiral benefits payable to him. The only issue is the time limit within which the said amount to be paid. On the side of the respondents, three months time is sought. However on the side of the petitioner it is insisted that the balance amount must be paid within a period of two months. Let me strike a balance and direct that the balance amount must be paid to the petitioner by the respondents within a period of 75 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The entire terminal benefits should be paid to the petitioner with applicable interest. I have taken a conscious decision not to examine the facts in detail since the charges as alleged against the petitioner had been quashed by the Court and had been set aside by the order of the Court. It is as if the petitioner had not faced any charges during his service period. The time limit within a period of 75 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order had been fixed by this Court after instructions obtained from Mr.S. Perumal, Legal Advisor of the respondents who is physically present in Court.

¶4With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

27.03.2025 dpq Index: Yes/No Speaking order / Non speaking order To

¶1The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu Revenue Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.

¶2The Director of Survey and Settlement, "Survey House" Chepauk, Chennai 600 005.

¶3The Assistant Director of Survey and Land Records, Coimbatore – 641 018.

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J. dpq

27.03.2025

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 27.03.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN R.Muthusamy ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu Revenue Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009. 2. The Director of Survey and Settlement, "Survey House" Chepauk, Chennai 600 005. 3. The Assistant Director of Survey and Land Records, Coimbatore – 641 018. ... Respondents Prayer :- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the 1st to 3rd respondents to release the petitioner's balance retiral benefits like pension/provisional pension, gratuity, balance special provident fund and admissible interest within the stipulated time as decided by this Court. For Petitioners : Ms.Inthu Karunakaran For Respondents : Mr.S.Yashwanth Additional Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.