L.Valarmathi v. The Government of Tamilnadu

ORDER Ms. P. Makeshwari, Counsel Representing Mr. P. Vijendran, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for consideration any further and, therefore, the Writ Petition has become infructuous. The representing counsel has also made an endorsement to that effect on the case bundle.

¶2In view of the aforesaid submission and the endorsement made by the representing counsel on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner in the bundle, the Writ petition is closed as infructuous. No costs. 14-07-2026 klt To

¶1The Government of Tamilnadu, Rep By Its Chief Secretary, School Education Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 9.

¶2The Principal Secretary/ State Project Director, Sarva Siksha Abhiyan, Chennai 6

¶3The Director of School Education, Chennai 6

¶4The Additional Principal Educational Officer (Movement of Education For All), Thiruvarur And District.

¶5The Chief Educational Officer, Thiruvarur District

¶6The Districtrict/Elementary Educational Officer, Thiruvarur District. WPoNo.o7180oofo2012 T.VINODoKUMAR,oJ. klt WPoNo.o7180oofo2012 14-07-2026 Page4oofo4

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR 1. L.Valarmathi W/o.Venugopal, No.2, Car Tank, South Bank, Needamangalam Taluk, Thiruvarur District. 2. B. Gowri W/o.Natarajan, No.170, 3rd Street, Chidambara Nagar, Thiruvarur Taluk And District. 3. V.Gopi S/o.Vellinathan, South Street, Kudithangicheri Post, Needamangalam Taluk, Thiruvarur District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Government of Tamilnadu, Rep by its Chief Secretary, School Education Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 9 2. The Principal Secretary/ State Project Director, Sarva Siksha Abhiyan, Chennai 6 3. The Director of School, Education, Chennai 6 4. The Additional Principal Educational Officer (Movement of Education For All), Thiruvarur & District 5. The Chief Educational Officer, Thiruvarur District Page2 of 4 6. The Districtrict/Elementary Educational Officer, Thiruvarur District 7. R. Vimal Raj Perumbugalur, Thiruvarur District 8. Mrs.Meenakshi Taluk Office Road, Needamangalam Taluk, Thiruvarur District 9. N.Pushba South Street, Near PCCB, Needamangalam Taluk, Thiruvarur District. ..Respondent(s) Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of declartion, declaring that the appointment of the respondents No.7 to 9 (7th respondent appointed as physical education teacher at the Government High School, Panangudi the 8th respondent was appointed as Tailaring Instructor at Panchayat Union Middle School, Senthangudi, Needamangalam Taluk, and the 9th respondent appointed as Drawing Instructor at Government High School (Needamangalam) made by the 5th and 6th respondents as illegal, void, arbitrary and against the Constitutional provisions and also guidelines available in G.O.(MS)No.177 dated 11.11.11 issued by the 1st respondent and consequently to direct the 3rd to 6th respondents to appoint the petitioners as instructors in the respective post as against the respondents. For Petitioner(s): Ms. P. Makeshwari for Mr. P. Vijendran For Respondent(s): Mrs. Y. Kavitha, Government Advocate (for R1 to R6) Mr. Vimal Raj (for R7) R8 and R9 dismissed, vide Court order dated 30.8.2016. Page3 of 4