M.Manavalan, v. The Chairman Cum

ORDER This Writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "to call for the records in respect of the impugned order in Ku.No./Me.Po./Se.Mi.Pa.Va./Va./Ni.Pi.2/U.4/

O.No.160/2009 dated 01.06.2009 passed by the 3rd respondent and subsequently rejection

of

appeal

order

in

proceeding Ku.No.013824/610/Nir.A./Aa.Pirivu/Udhavi

dated

21.11.2013 passed by the 2nd respondent and the rejection of mercy plea vide proceeding Vaariya Nilai Aanai (Neerantharam) Chairman cum Managing Director dated 15.04.2015 passed by the 1st respondent and quash the same."

¶2The brief facts of the case are as follows:-

2.1 The petitioner was employed as a Foreman, Grade-I, at the Minjur West Station. While in service, the petitioner was placed under suspension, vide proceedings dated 19.06.2006, on the allegation that he had unauthorizedly extended an agricultural service connection to a pump-set owned by one Ananda Naidu, by using old materials with the assistance of contract labourers and outsiders, without obtaining the mandatory prior permission from higher officials. Subsequently, the petitioner's suspension was revoked, vide Page3 of 6 proceedings dated 23.08.2006, and he was transferred and posted to the Vyasarpadi Division.

2.2 In such circumstances, after a lapse of about two years, disciplinary proceedings were initiated against the petitioner on the very same set of allegations. Upon completion of the departmental enquiry, the Enquiry Officer submitted a report holding that the charges levelled against the petitioner stood proved. Consequent upon the enquiry report, the 3rd respondent, vide proceedings dated 01.06.2009, imposed a punishment of stoppage of the petitioner's next increment for a period of six months without cumulative effect.

2.3 Aggrieved by the said punishment, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the 2nd respondent and the appellate authority, vide order dated

21.11.2013, rejected the appeal solely on the ground of delay. Thereafter, the petitioner moved a mercy petition dated 06.01.2014 before the 1st respondent, which also came to be rejected, vide order dated 15.04.2015. Challenging the primary punishment order as well as the subsequent orders of rejection, the petitioner has approached this Court by way of the present Writ Petition.

¶3Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record.

¶4Upon a careful perusal of the materials placed before this Court, particularly the explanation submitted by the delinquent employee, this Court Page4 of 6 finds that the petitioner failed to tender any plausible explanation to rebut the charges levelled against him. Furthermore, during the course of the departmental enquiry, the petitioner failed to establish his innocence or disprove the allegations.

¶5The main charge against the petitioner is that, while functioning as a Foreman under the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, he misused his official position to provide an agricultural service connection to the said Ananda Naidu by deploying old materials without administrative approval. It is neither the case of the petitioner that the service connection extended to the beneficiary was authorized by any order of the Board, nor is there any material on record to show that the said Ananda Naidu was legally allotted a service connection by the competent authority.

¶6The petitioner was the Foreman in authority over the area in question, making him the sole person responsible for managing and overseeing the service connections. The unauthorized enjoyment of the service connection by the beneficiary is directly attributable to the petitioner's omissions and commissions.

¶7Furthermore, considering the gravity of the charges, the punishment of stoppage of increment for six months without cumulative effect is just and Page5 of 6 reasonable and thereby, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned orders.

¶8For the reasons aforesaid, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

19.08.2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order skt To:

¶1The Chairman cum Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

¶2The Chief Engineer (Administration), Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

¶3The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002. W.P.No.26661oofo2015 KRISHNASWAMYoGOVINDARAJAN,oJ. skt W.P.No.26661oofo2015 and M.P.No.1oofo2015

19.08.2026 Page6oofo6

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19.08.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNASWAMY GOVINDARAJAN and M.P.No.1 of 2015 M.Manavalan ..Petitioner(s) Vs. 1. The Chairman cum Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002. 2. The Chief Engineer (Administration), Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002. 3. The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records in respect of the impugned order in Ku.No./Me.Po./Se.Mi.Pa.Va./Va./Ni.Pi.2/U.4/ O.No.160/2009 dated 01.06.2009 passed by the 3rd respondent and subsequently rejection of appeal order in proceeding Ku.No.013824/610/Nir.A./ Aa.Pirivu/Udhavi 2/13 dated 21.11.2013 passed by the 2nd respondent and the rejection of mercy plea vide proceeding Vaariya Nilai Aanai (Neerantharam) Chairman cum Managing Director dated 15.04.2015 passed by the 1st respondent and quash the same. Page2 of 6 For Petitioner(s) : Mr.P.Wesley Isaac For Respondent(s) : Mr.K.Purushothaman, Standing Counsel