VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

N. Balan v. Union of India

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
23 March 2026
Bench
S.M. Subramaniam, K. Surender
Case no.
WA 1930/2023

Follow Madras High CourtFollow S.M. SubramaniamFollow K. Surender

Judgment

JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.M.Subramaniam J.) Under assail is the writ order dated 13.09.2022 passed in W.P.Nos.2502, 2024 & 2503 of 2016 respectively.

¶2Learned counsel for the appellants would mainly contend that the writ Court has not granted the compensation, but granted only interest.

¶3Paragraph No.8 of the writ order dated 13.09.2022 reads as under:

8.In view of the above, this Court directs the respondents to pay the compensation amount to the petitioners with applicable interest in terms of Section 30(4) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If any benefit is extended to similarly situated persons, the same may be extended to these petitioners also, subject to the confirmation of the same, by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court . Page4 of 5 W.P.Nos.2502 to 2504 of 2016 or by any other Appellate Court.

¶4The above portion of the order would clarify that the writ court directed the respondents to pay compensation amount along with the applicable interest in terms of the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. That apart, the writ court has further granted the benefit, if any, extended to similarly situated persons. That being the order of the writ court, the apprehension raised by the appellants is baseless. Thus, the Writ Appeals stand dismissed. No costs. (S.M.S.,J.) (K.S.,J.) 23-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order VSI To

¶1The Secretary to Government, Union of India, Highways Department, New Delhi

¶3The Deputy Collector (Revenue) South-Cum-Land Acquisition Officer, Office of the Deputy Collector (Revenue) South, Villianur WAoNo.o1930oofo2023 S.M.SUBRAMANIAMeJ. AND K.SURENDEReJ. VSI WAeNo.e1930,e1932e&e1933eofe2023 23-03-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER WA No. 1930, 1932 & 1933 of 2023 N. Balan Son of Late Natarajan, Residing at No.6, Villianur Main Road, Arumparthapuram, Puducherry-605 ..Appellant(s) Vs 1. Union of India Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Highways Department, New Delhi 3. The Deputy Collector (Revenue) South-Cum-Land Acquisition Officer, Office of the Deputy Collector (Revenue) South, Villianur ..Respondent(s) WA No. 1932 of 2023 N.Selvaraj Son of Late Natarajan, Residing at No.6, Villianur Main Road, Arumparthapuram, Puducherry-605 ..Appellant(s) Vs 1. Union of India Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Highways Department, New Delhi. Page2 of 5 3. The Deputy Collector(Revenue) South-Cum-Land Acquisition Officer Office of the Deputy Collector (Revenue) South, Villianur. ..Respondent(s) WA No. 1933 of 2023 N.Murugasamy, Son of Late Natarajan, Residing at No.6, Villianur Main Road, Arumparthapuram, Puducherry-605 ..Appellant(s) Vs 1. Union of India Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Highways Department, New Delhi 3. The Deputy Collector (Revenue) South-Cum-Land Acquisition Officer, Office of the Deputy Collector (Revenue) South, Villianur ..Respondent(s) To set aside the Order dated 13.09.2022 passed in WP.No. 2502/2016 and consequently allow the WP.No. 2502/2016 WA No. 1932 of 2023 To set aside the order dt.13.09.2022 passed in W.P.No. 2504/2016. WA No. 1933 of 2023 To set aside the order dated 13.09.2022 passed in Page3 of 5 WP.no.2503/2016 and consequently allow the WP.No.2503/2016. For Appellant(s): T. Sai Krishnan For Respondent(s): Na For R1 And R2 Dr B Ramasamy Agp For Puduchery COMMON

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.