- Court
- High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh
- Decided
- 28 July 2026
- Bench
- Rajnesh Oswal, Judge
- Case no.
- WP(C) 3561/2025
Follow Jammu and Kashmir High CourtFollow Rajnesh OswalFollow Judge
Judgment
ORDER
28.07.2026
¶1Petitioner Nos. 1, 2 & 3 claim to be the owners of land measuring 8 kanals (Khasra No. 51), 30 kanals (Khasra No. 1109/66 min, 66 min and 43), and 6 kanals (Khasra No. 18) respectively situated at village Budhan, Tehsil Thuroo, District Reasi. They have filed the present petition seeking a direction to the respondents to initiate and conclude the acquisition proceedings under the provisions of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, and consequently pay compensation to the petitioners, on the ground that their land has come under the alignment of Budhan to Karamkatha road. The petitioners have also prayed for the payment of rental compensation for use and occupation of their land w.e.f., 2018-19.
¶2It is stated by the petitioners that the respondents commenced the construction of the aforesaid road in the year 2018, but the acquisition proceedings were not taken to their logical conclusion and in the meantime Right Serial No. 37
to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, was made applicable in the Union Territory of J&K with effect from 31.10.2019, whereupon instructions were issued for re-submission of land indent for construction of roads in PMGSY Division, Mahore.
¶3Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, the petitioners would restrict their claim only to the payment of compensation under the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.
¶4Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4 have filed their response stating therein that the ownership and possession of the petitioners are borne out from the revenue records, subject to verification by the Competent Revenue Authorities. It is further admitted that indent communications were issued by respondent No. 2 with regard to PMGSY roads including the Budhan to Karamkatha road. However, the same were only administrative in nature for initiation of acquisition formalities and do not confer any right upon the petitioners unless and until the acquisition proceedings are completed in accordance with law.
¶5The respondents in clause (B) of the prayer part have themselves requested to dispose of the writ petition by directing the Revenue Authorities to conclude the acquisition proceedings in accordance with law within a time frame as may be deemed appropriate by this Court.
¶6Respondent No. 3 has also filed a response stating that the relief sought by the petitioners is subject to fulfilment of statutory requirements, including availability of funds.
¶7Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
¶8The sole grievance raised by the petitioners is that the respondents be directed to initiate and conclude the acquisition proceedings in respect of the land claimed to be owned by the petitioners, which has admittedly come under the alignment of the Budhan to Karamkatha road. The respondents too, in fact, have agreed for the disposal of the writ petition by directing them to proceed in accordance with law.
¶9The record further reveals that, in terms of communication dated
18.04.2022, respondent No. 2 submitted the indents to respondent No. 3. Thus, it is for respondent No. 3 to take the process further.
¶10In view of the foregoing, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to conclude the acquisition proceedings qua the land of the petitioners in accordance with law within a period of six months from the date a copy of this order is served upon them and pay the compensation within the aforesaid period.
¶11Disposed of.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
Jammu
28.07.2026 AKHILESH
Case details
Parties and counsel
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case: - WP(C) No. 3561/2025 Abdul Gaffar and Ors. …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Irfan Khan, Advocate vs UT of J&K and Ors. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Sagira Jaffer, Assisting counsel to Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr.AAG Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
Source: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.