VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Md. Mannaf Ali v. The State of Assam

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
16 May 2024
Bench
Robin Phukanauthor
Case no.
Bail Appln. 1359/2024

Follow Gauhati High CourtFollow Robin Phukan

Judgment

ORDER

17.05.2024

Heard Mr. T. Kalita, learned counsel for the accused and Mr. K.K. Das, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent.

¶2This application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is preferred by accused namely, Md. Mannaf Ali, who has been languishing in jail hazot, in connection with the Hajo P.S. Case No. 102/2024, under Section 380 and added Section 411 of the IPC, for granting bail. Page No.# 2/3

¶3The said case has been registered on the basis of one FIR lodged by one Arabinda Malakar, on 30.03.2024. The essence of allegations made in the FIR is that on 29.03.2024, at about 11:45 pm, some unknown persons have committed theft of one brown coloured cow and one while coloured calf, in one Eon vehicle, bearing registration No. AS-01-EE-6555.

¶4Mr. Kalita, learned counsel for the accused submits that the accused was arrested on 28.04.2024, and since then he been languishing in jail hazot for last 20 days. Mr. Kalita further submits that three numbers of cow were recovered from his possession and of the said cows, he has purchased one from Madhav Bhaisya and two others from Darul Hashid Pub-Borkhetri Alia Madrassa Market and in support of his submission he has produced three purchase receipt. Mr. Kalita also submits that he is innocent and no way involved with the offence alleged in the FIR and that he is ready to cooperate with the investigating agency and therefore, it is contended to allow the petition.

¶5On the other hand, Mr. Das, learned Additional Public Prosecutor has produced the case diary before this Court and submits that the stolen cow and the calf are yet to be recovered and that the investigation is still on and therefore, it is contended to dismiss the petition.

¶6Having heard the submissions of learned Advocates of both sides, I have carefully gone through the petition as well as the documents placed on record and also perused the Case Diary with the assistance of learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

¶7It appears that the accused was arrested on 28.04.2024, and since then he been languishing in jail hazot for last 20 days. Further, it appears that three numbers of cows were recovered from the possession of the accused and the documents placed on record indicates that of the said cows, he has purchased one Page No.# 3/3 from Madhav Bhaisya and two others from Darul Hashid Pub-Borkhetri Alia Madrassa Market.

¶8Having considered above and also considering the period of detention and balancing the same with nature and gravity of the offence alleged in the FIR, this Court is of the view that further custodial detention may not be warranted in the interest of investigation.

¶9Accordingly, it is provided that on furnishing a bond of Rs. 50,000/- only, with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hajo, the accused be enlarged on bail.

¶10In terms of above, this bail application stands disposed of.

¶11The case diary be returned.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010095242024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1359/2024 MD. MANNAF ALI S/O LT. MAHNUR ALI R/O VILL- LOHARKATA P.S. MUKALMUA, DIST. NALBARI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR T KALITA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.