Abu Taleb Ali v. Hasina Bibi

ORDER

06.11.2024

Heard Mr. T Sk., learned counsel for the petitioner. Although the name of the sole respondent has been shown in the Cause List, but none appears for her. The respondent filed a petition under Section 125 of the CrPC. Notice was issued to the present petitioner. In spite of service of notice, the petitioner did not appear in the Court. Therefore, the Court passed the ex parte order. It may be stated that on the date of the judgment, the petitioner filed an application stating that due to unavoidable circumstances, he could not appear in the Court on that date. I have considered the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. This court is of the opinion that no error has been committed by the trial Court. The petitioner intentionally did not appear before the trial court. Therefore, this Court finds that this petition has no merit. Hence, the present criminal revision petition stands dismissed and disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

PageoNo.#o1/2 GAHC010039192024 ooooooo ooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooTHEoGAUHATIoHIGHoCOURTo (HIGHoCOURToOFoASSAM,oNAGALAND,oMIZORAMoANDoARUNACHALoPRADESH)o CaseoNo.o:oCrl.Rev.P./133/2024o ABUoTALEBoALIo S/OoLATEoJINNAToALIo VILL-oASHARIKANDI,oMADAIKHALIo PO.oMADAIKHALIoBO,oP.S.oGAURIPURo DIST.oDHUBRI,oASSAMo PIN-783331. VERSUSo HASINAoBIBIo D/OoHASMAToALIo W/OoABUoTALEBoALIo VIL-oFALIMARIoPART-Io P.S.oDHUBRI,o P.O.oFALIMARIo DIST.oDHUBRI,oASSAM,o PIN-783325 AdvocateoforotheoPetitionerooooo:oMR.oToSK,oMR.oIoALAMo AdvocateoforotheoRespondento:oMR.oAoIoTALUKDAR,oMR.oRoKARIM,MR.oAoISLAM,MS.oJoA oAHMEDoo ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA