- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 7 November 2017
- Bench
- A.K. Pathak
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 4548/2017
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow A.K. Pathak
Judgment
O R D E R %
07.11.2017 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that matter has been settled with the respondent no.2, in as much as settled amount has been paid, therefore, FIR No.3116/2015 under Section 135 of Electricity Act(amend),2003 registered at Police Station Mehrauli on the complaint of respondent no,2, may be quashed. Learned counsel for respondent no.2 says that he has instructions from respondent no.2 to convey the Court that matter has been settled with the petitioners and settled amount has also been received. Keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the petitioners and respondent no.2, in as much as entire settled amount stands paid, in the interest of justice, FIR No.3116/2015 under Section 135 of Electricity Act(amend),2003 registered at Police Station Mehrauli and the consequent proceedings emanating thereform are quashed. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Miscellaneous applications are disposed of as infructuous. Dasti. A.K. PATHAK, J NOVEMBER 07, 2017 sm
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4548/2017 RAVI DASS ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Gaurav Chauhan, Adv with petitioner in person versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. M S Oberoi, APP for State ASI Vijay Pratap, PS Mehrauli Mr. Raghav Chadha, Adv for R- 2/BSES CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.