VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2017 › High Court of Delhi

Kusum Dawra & Anr v. State & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
7 November 2017
Bench
A.K. Pathakauthor
Case no.
CRL.M.C. 3444/2017

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow A.K. Pathak

Judgment

O R D E R %

07.11.2017 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that matter has been settled with the respondent no.2, in as much as settled amount has been paid, therefore, FIR No.2736/2014 under Section 135 of Electricity Act(amend),2003 and 379 IPC registered at Police Station Mehrauli on the complaint of respondent no,2, may be quashed. Learned counsel for respondent no.2 says that he has instructions from respondent no.2 to convey the Court that matter has been settled with the petitioners and settled amount has also been received. 'No Due Certificate' issued by respondent no.2 is on record as Annexure P-2. Keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the petitioners and respondent no.2, in as much as entire settled amount stands paid, in the interest of justice, FIR No.2736/2014 under Section 135 of Electricity Act(amend),2003 and 379 IPC registered at PS Mehrauli and the consequent proceedings emanating thereform are quashed. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous. Dasti. A.K. PATHAK, J NOVEMBER 07, 2017 sm

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3444/2017 KUSUM DAWRA & ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Gaurav Dawar, Adv versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. M S Oberoi, APP for State ASI Vijay Pratap, PS Mehrauli Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing Counsel for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.