- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 7 November 2017
- Bench
- Ashutosh Kumar
- Case no.
- W.P.(CRL) 2409/2017
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Ashutosh Kumar
Judgment
O R D E R %
07.11.2017 Mr. B. Mahapatra, learned Advocate has fairly stated that pursuant to the direction of this Court, protection was afforded to the petitioners. In fact, some of the police officers of the concerned police station had visited the house of the petitioner on 04.11.2017. Mr. Jamal Akhtar, learned counsel for the State has assured this Court that as and when it will be necessary, protection will be afforded to the petitioners. In view of such stand of the State, no further order is required to be passed. The petition is disposed off accordingly. ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J NOVEMBER 07, 2017/nd
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2409/2017 RAM KUMAR SHARMA & ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr. B. Mahapatra, Advocate versus COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Jamal Akhtar and Mr. Chaitanya Gosain for Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel for State Mr. Ravinder Sharawat and Ms. Anjna, Advocates for R-3 SI Randeep, P.S. Prashant Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.