- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 8 November 2017
- Bench
- A.K. Pathak
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 3163/2017
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow A.K. Pathak
Judgment
O R D E R %
08.11.2017 It is submitted that petitioner and respondent no. 2 are living in the same locality. It is further submitted that with the intervention of their common friends and other family members, petitioner and respondent no. 2 have settled their disputes amicably; therefore, FIR No. 311/2014 under Sections 354(A)/354(D)/34 IPC registered at Police Station Bharat Nagar on the complaint of respondent no. 2, may be quashed. Respondent no. 2 is present in Court and has been identified by SI Shivali of Police Station Bharat Nagar. Respondent no. 2 says that petitioner has apologised for his conduct and she has pardoned him. She further says that she has now settled the matter with the petitioner of her own free will, voluntarily and without any undue force, pressure or coercion. Respondent no. 2 submits that she is not willing to pursue the FIR any further and the same may be quashed, in view of the settlement. Her affidavit is also on record at page 14 and has been perused. Keeping in mind the settlement arrived at between the petitioner and respondent no. 2 voluntarily, in the interest of justice, FIR No. 311/2014 under Sections 354(A)/354(D)/34 IPC registered at Police Station Bharat Nagar and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.
A.K. PATHAK, J. NOVEMBER 08, 2017 r.bararia
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3163/2017 ANKIT KUMAR @ BOBBY ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Rajeev Shukla and Mr. Pujya Kumar Singh, Advs. with petitioner in person versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP with SI Shivali, P.S. Bharat Nagar for respondent no. 1 Respondent no. 2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.