- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 3 November 2016
- Bench
- S. Ravindra Bhat, Deepa Sharma
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 9996/2016
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow S. Ravindra BhatFollow Deepa Sharma
Judgment
O R D E R %
03.11.2016
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that refund claimed was cancelled on 26.10.2012. However, it is brought to the notice of the court by applicant that even as on date the respondent's website indicates that the refund application is pending. It is stated by respondents that the file is yet untraceable. In these circumstances, the application shall be processed and appropriate orders be made afresh within two weeks and communicated to the petitioner.
The writ petition is disposed of.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
DEEPA SHARMA, J NOVEMBER 03, 2016/sapna
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9996/2016 & CM No. 39669/2016 IJM (INDIA) GEOTECHNIQUES PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Jain, Advocate along with Mr. Virag Tiwari, Advocate. versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Satyakam, Addl Standing Counsel, Govt. of NCT of Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.