- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 4 November 2016
- Bench
- Indermeet Kaur
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 10374/2016
Judgment
O R D E R %
04.11.2016
The petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the statutory bodies. His submission is that there is illegal hawking and encroachment being carried out on both sides of the road i.e. footpath and in front of the factories of the petitioner i.e. Y-1, Y-2 and Y-3, Okhla Industrial Area, Phase-II, New Delhi. This is in active connivance inter-se the statutory bodies.
On advance notice, learned counsels for the respondents have put in appearance. Learned counsel for respondent No. 1 submits that an action taken program has been scheduled on 11.11.2016 and all necessary illegal encroachments shall be removed from the site. The active assistance of respondent No. 2 shall be given to respondent No.
1.
No further orders are called for on this petition. Petition disposed of.
Order dasti under the signature of the Court Master.
INDERMEET KAUR, J NOVEMBER 04, 2016 A
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10374/2016 & C.M. No.40786/2016 M/S ABLE INDUSTRIES AND ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Naresh Sharma, Adv. versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR ..... Respondents Through Ms.Manorma Masih, Adv for R-1. Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC with Ms. Pratishtha, Adv for GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.