- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 4 November 2016
- Bench
- Sunil Gaur
- Case no.
- FAO 364/2014
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Sunil Gaur
Judgment
O R D E R %
04.11.2016 At the outset, this Court is informed that the suit is at the stage of defendant's evidence. In such a case, this Court is not inclined to exercise its discretion to test the impugned order refusing interim injunction, as trial of this case is at fairly advanced stage. In the facts and circumstances of this case, trial court is directed to complete the trial of this case within a period of six months from the date already fixed. With aforesaid directions, this appeal and the application are disposed of. (SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE NOVEMBER 04, 2016 s
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO 364/2014 & C.M.No.18935/2014 M/S KHUSHI RAM BEHARI LAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Chetan Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman and Mr. Anil Kumar Sahu, Advocates versus M/S P K OVERSEAS PVT LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Mr. Akhil Sachar, Mr. Nikhil Chawla andd Mr. Raghu Vashist, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.