VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2016 › High Court of Delhi

Krishan @ Raju v. State (Nct of Delhi)

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
3 November 2016
Bench
Vipin Sanghiauthor
Case no.
BAIL APPLN. 1559/2016

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Vipin Sanghi

Judgment

O R D E R %

03.11.2016

After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner shall be satisfied if the trial is expedited. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the Trial Court to expedite the trial.

Mr. Dutta states that out of 30 witnesses, 18 have already been examined and the examination of the remaining 12 witnesses, who are formal witnesses primarily would be completed without any delay.

The prosecution shall produce the witnesses on the date fixed henceforth and shall not seek any adjournment. It is hoped that the remaining prosecution evidence shall be recorded within the next three months.

VIPIN SANGHI, J NOVEMBER 03, 2016 sr

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1559/2016 KRISHAN @ RAJU ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. VPS Raghav, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP with SI Manoj Kumar, PS Gulabi Bagh CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.