- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 7 November 2017
- Bench
- A.K. Pathak
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 1428/2017
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow A.K. Pathak
Judgment
O R D E R %
07.11.2017 Learned counsels for the petitioner and respondent no. 2 submit that the matter has been settled. In terms of the settlement, respondent no. 2 has agreed to withdraw the criminal complaint, which is subject matter of this petition. It is submitted that an application has also been filed by the respondent no. 2 for withdrawal of the complaint case. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of. Petitioner is at liberty to revive this petition in case respondent no. 2 fails to withdraw the complaint case. Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous.
A.K. PATHAK, J. NOVEMBER 07, 2017 r.bararia
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1428/2017 & Crl. M.A. no. 5895/2017 SUBHRANGHSU CHAKRABARTI ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Rajiv Bhatnagar and Mr. Ratnil Chauhan, Advs. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr. G.M. Farooqui, APP for the State Mr. Nitin Mangla, Adv. for complainant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.