R.K.Gupta v. Anoop Nigam

¶38% 08.11.2010 Present: Mr. Parveen Mehdiratta with Mr. S.C. Pandey, Adv. for petitioner. Ms. Beenashaw Soni, Adv. for respondent. +CM(M) 1254/2009 * After some arguments, counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the petition and submits that direction may be given to the learned Additional Rent Controller where the eviction petition of petitioner is pending for expeditious disposal of the matter as the eviction petition is pending since 2005. The counsel for the respondent has no objection to this. Counsel for the respondent submits that written statement has been filed by the respondent but there is slight delay in filing the written statement before the learned Additional Rent Controller and an application has been filed for condonation of delay in filing the written statement. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has no objection if written statement is taken on record by learned ARC subject to costs. Learned Additional Rent Controller will consider the said application of respondent on the date fixed in the light of above submission of petitioner and pass appropriate order on the same. In view of above the present petition stands dismissed as CM(M) 1254/2009 \\ Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. withdrawn. Learned Additional Rent Controller is directed to dispose of the eviction petition expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of this order. Trial court record be sent back along with copy of this order. NOVEMBER 08, 2010 srb CM(M) 1254/2009 VEENA BIRBAL, J