Yogesh Kumar & Ors v. State & Ors

J. # 0/o 12.11.2010 Present: Mr. V.K. Kalra, Adv. for the Petitioners. Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State with SI Bihari Lal, P.S. Hauz Quazi, Delhi. Respondent No.2 in person. + Crl. M.C. No. 3523/2010 * \ Petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 were married as per Hindu rites and ceremonies sometime in the year 2007. Due to matrimonial acrimony, they could not live together for long. On the complaint of respondent No. 2, FIR in question was registered at police station Hauz Quazi. Petitioner Nos. 2 to 6 are relatives of petitioner No. 1. They approached the Additional Sessions Judge seeking anticipatory bail. During pendency of the bail application, matter was referred to Mediation Center, Tis Hazari Courts, where both the parties have amicably settled their disputes. Terms of settlement have been recorded in the proceeding-sheets 24th February, 2010 (Annexure A). Parties shall remain bound by the terms of settlement. In fact, they have obtained decree of divorce by mutual consent on 25th September, 2010. In terms of the Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. settlement, remaining settled amount of I-has been paid by petitioner No. 1 to respondent No.2 in cash in the Court. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties and in the larger interest, I quash the FIR No.120 I 2009 under Sections 498-AI 406 I 34 IPC registered at police station Hauz Quazi and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti. NOVEMBER 12, 2010 rb