VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2010 › High Court of Delhi

Dr.Amrit Pal Singh Bhatia v. Dr.Suneeta Bhatia & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
10 November 2010
Bench
Ajit Bharihokeauthor
Case no.
CRL.M.C. 3488/2010

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Ajit Bharihoke

Judgment

#31

10.11.2010 Present: \ Mr. S.S.Bhatia, Advocate with Mr. Naveen Arya, Advocate for the petitioner with petitioner in person. Ms.Fizani Husain, APP for the State/R2 with 10 51 Vikas Kumar, P.S.Mandawli Fazad Pur. Mr.Arun Sharma, Advocate for the respondent No. 1 with respondent No. 1 in person. +Cri.M.A. 17145/2010 (exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. ' Cri.M.C.3488/2010 This is a petition seeking quashing of FIR No. 485/2009, P.S. Mandawli Fazad Pur under Sections 498A IPC and the proceedings arising out of the same on the ground of settlement. Petitioner Amrit Pal Singh Bhatia as well as respondent No. 1 Dr. Suneeta Bhatia are present. Petitioner is identified by his counsel Sh.

5.5. Bhatia, Advocate. Respondent No. 1 Dr. Sunita Bhatia is identified by her counsel Sh. Arun Sharma, Advocate and the Investigating Officer 51 Vikas Kumar, P.S. Mandawli Fazad Pur . • Both the parties confirm that they have amicably settled the matter and now, there is no dispute left between them. Terms of settlement were recorded before the Mediator. Both petitioner and respondent No. 1 confirm that they have signed the terms of settlement annexed to the petition of their own accord without any undue influence or pressure from any corner and they undertake to comply with the terms and conditions of settlement. Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. , In view of the compromise arrived at between the parties, learned APP for the State has no objection if the instant FIR as well as the proceedings of the same are quashed. Since the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement and there is no dispute left between them, I am of the view that no useful purpose shall be served by keeping the present FIR as well as the proceedings arising out the same alive. Accordingly, FIR No. 485/2009, P.S. Mandawli Fazad Pur and the proceedings emanating from the same • are hereby quashed. Petition stands disposed of. NOVEMBER 10, 2010 akb Jv (AJIT BHARIHOKE) JUDGE

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.