VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2010 › High Court of Delhi

Sitq India Private Ltd

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
15 November 2010
Bench
Sanjiv Khannaauthor
Case no.
CO.APPL.(M) 200/2010

Judgment

O R D E R (ORAL)

¶1The present first motion under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (Act, for short) has been filed by CDP Real Estate Advisory India Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the transferor company) and SITQ India Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the transferee company).

¶2By this application, the transferor company and the transferee company seek dispensation from holding meeting of the equity shareholders and creditors to consider and approve, with or without modification, the proposed scheme of amalgamation, which has been enclosed as Annexure-I to the present application.

¶3The two applicant companies have enclosed with the application copy of the Resolutions passed by their Board of Directors approving the proposed scheme of amalgamation. It is stated in the application that no proceedings under Sections 235 and 251 of the Act are pending against the transferor company and the transferee company.

¶4The transferor company and the transferee company are private limited companies, which are not listed at any stock exchange. The transferor company has two shareholders, who have given their consent/no COMPANY APPLICATION (M) NO. 200/2010 Page 2

objection certificates to the proposed scheme of amalgamation, which has been enclosed at pages 252 and 253 of the paper book. The list of shareholders is duly certified by Mr. Aditya Bhargava, Director of the transferor company. Mr. Aditya Bhargava, Director of the transferor company has further certified that there are no secured and unsecured creditors in the books of the transferor company as on 14th October, 2010, the appointed date. In these circumstances, the need and requirement to hold meeting of the shareholders of the transferor company is dispensed with. There is no need to hold meeting of the creditors of the transferor company as the transferor company does not have any creditor as per the certificate issued by the Director of the transferor company.

¶5The transferee company has two shareholders as per the list enclosed at page No. 255. The said list is also certified by Mr. Aditya Bhargava, who is the Managing Director of the transferee company. The said shareholders have given their no objection/consent letters to the proposed scheme of amalgamation, which have been enclosed at pages 256 and 257. Mr. Aditya Bhargava, Managing Director has certified that the transferee company does not have any secured and unsecured creditors as on 14th October, 2010. In view of the no objection certificates/consent letters of the shareholders of the transferee company, there is no need to hold meeting of the shareholders of the said company to consider the proposed scheme of amalgamation and the same is dispensed with. As the transferee company does not have any secured or unsecured creditors as on 14th October, 2010, there is no need to hold meeting of the creditors of the transferee company. Accordingly, the first motion is allowed.

The application is disposed of.

DASTI.

SANJIV KHANNA, J.

NOVEMBER 15, 2010

VKR

Case details

Parties and counsel

COMPANY APPLICATION (M) NO. 200/2010 Page 1 23. *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + COMPANY APPLICATION (M) NO. 200/2010 Date of decision: 15th November, 2010 CDP REAL ESTATE ADVISORY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITD ..... Transferor Company. WITH SITQ INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Transferee Company. Through Mr. Gyanendra Kumar, Mr. Abhilash Pillai, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.