- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 11 November 2011
- Bench
- Mukta Gupta
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 3612/2011
Judgment
ORDER %
11.11.2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 216/2006 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS Preet Vihar, Delhi. The Complainant/Respondent No. 2 Ms. Ralchi is present in person ^ and is identified by the Investigating Officer and her counsel. She states that the Petitioners and Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise. In terms of the settlement, maniage between the Petitioner No.l and Respondent No. 2/Complainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consenton 26''^ May, 2010. As full and final settlement of all the claims of the Respondent No. 2, the Petitioner No. 1 has to pay ^2 CRL.M.C. 3612/2011 Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. lakhs out of which f 1 lakhs have already been paid to her and ?1 lakh has been paid to her in the form of FDR in the name of the children. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. Consequently, FIR No. 216/2006 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS Preet Vihar, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court. The petition is disposed of Order dasti. NOVEMBER 11, 2011
MUKTA GUPTA, J. CRL.M.C. 3612/2011 ^ Page2of2 - /
Case details
Parties and counsel
46# $~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3612/2011 KAPIL CHOPRA &ORS. Petitioners Through: Mr. Harsh Khanna, Advocate with Petitioners in person. versus STATE & ANR. Respondents - Through: Mi". Mukesh Gupta, APP with SI Ganga Ram. ^ Mr. Vaibhav Kumar, Advocate for Respondent No. 2 with Respondent No. 2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.