K.M.Baby v. UOI and Ors

ORDER

¶08r. r..20 r.1

¶1Notice.

¶2Ms. Kimmi Brara, Advocate, accepts notice of the petition on behalf of respondents.

¶3After arguing for some time, it has transpired that petitioner's appeal (Annexure-4) was decided way back on

1.10 .2009, which according to the respondents was communicated to the petitioner on 6.10.2009. This is disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner. "i 4. Learned counsel for respondents has drawn the attention of this Court to the order of 26.7.2011, vide which the District Judge concerned has dismissed petitioner's appeal against the order of

30.9.2010 (Annexure-7), which is sought to be impugned in this petition. -a Vo i W.P.(C) No,7893/201I Page 1 Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. v/) *-a

¶5Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner was not aware of it.

¶6Today a capy of order of 1.10.2009 of the concerned authority as well as copy of order dated 26.7.2011-has been handed over to petitioner'S counsel, who states that liberty be given to challenge the arbitrary action of the respondents by filing a fresh petition.

¶7This petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as aforesaid. CM Nos. 17865/2011 & CM No.17866/2011 (both u/S 151 CPC) Dismissed as infructuous. NOVEMBER 08, 2OI.1 rs r, 'tL GAUR, J W.P.(C) No.7893/20\1 PageZ

r t $-99 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI w.P.(c) 7893l20rL K.M.BABY ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Lilly Thomas, Advocate VCTSUS UOI AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Kimmi Brara, Advocate with Mr. Hem Raj Garg, Asst. Dealing Officer CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR