VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2011 › High Court of Delhi

Sarla Jain & Ors v. State & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
4 November 2011
Bench
V.K. Shaliauthor
Case no.
CRL.M.C. 3634/2011

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow V.K. Shali

Judgment

ORDER o/o

04.11.2011 • 1. This is a petition for quashing of FIR No.226/2011, u/s 420/120B IPG registered by PS Ashok Vihar, in respect of which charge-sheet is yet to be filed.

¶2The ground for quashing of the FIR is that the petitioner has settled the matter with the respondent No.2/complainant. Affidavits of the petitioners are on record. Petitioners are also present in Court and are duly identified by the learned counsel for the petitioners. Respondent No.2 is also present and she is identified by Inspector, V.K.Sharma. She has also filed an affidavit stating that the she has no objection to the quashing of the FIR on the ground that the matter has been settled. Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. O—

¶3Having regard to the aforesaid facts, I feel that useful purpose would be served by keeping the aforesaid FIR and consequent proceedings pending. Accordingly FIR No.226/2011, u/s 420/120B IPG registered by PS Ashok Vihar and the consequent proceedings are quashed.

¶4The petition stands disposed of. V.K. SHALI, J NOVEMBER 04, 2011 - I

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3634/2011 SARLA JAIN & ORS Petitioners Through: i^lr.Vinoci Khanna, Advocate versus STATE & ORS Respondents Through: Mr.Sunil Sharma, APP. Inspector V.K.Sharma, PS Ashok Vihar. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.