- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 6 November 2017
- Bench
- R.K.Gauba
- Case no.
- MAC.APP. 980/2011
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow R.K.Gauba
Judgment
JUDGMENT (ORAL)
¶1The appellant, insurer of the vehicle found involved in the motor vehicular accident that occurred on 26.04.2006, its driver (second respondent) having been found to be negligent giving rise to cause of action in favour of the first respondent to seek compensation in accident claim case (suit no. 421/2009), while contesting had raised the issue of breach of terms and conditions of the insurance policy on the ground that the vehicle had been brought on road without any valid permit. This plea was not accepted by the tribunal which fastened the liability on it (the appellant) to pay compensation to the first respondent.
¶2Reiterating the said plea, the present appeal was brought to seek recovery rights. It is noted that the appellant failed to take appropriate
MAC Appeal No. 980/2011
steps to have the notice served on the second or third respondent inspite of several opportunities granted.
¶3The appeal is dismissed.
¶4The statutory deposit shall be refunded upon proof of the award having been satisfied, being furnished.
R.K.GAUBA, J. NOVEMBER 6, 2017 nk
Case details
Parties and counsel
MAC Appeal No. 980/2011 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on: 6th November, 2017 + MAC.APP. 980/2011 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr.A.K. Soni, Adv. versus MRINAL PANDEY & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.