- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 9 November 2011
- Bench
- Mukta Gupta
- Case no.
- W.P.(CRL) 1484/2011
Judgment
ORDER
09.11.2011 I'his is a pclition for cluashing of IrIR No. 10412008 undel Scctions 498A1406134IPC rcgistered at PS CAW Cell, Nanak Pura, New Delhi. 'fhe Cornplainant/Respondent No. 2 Dr. Shirley Goel is present in pcrson and is identified by the Investigating Officer and hel counsel. Shc s1a1cs that the Petitioners and Itespondcnt No.2/Cornplainant have cntcrcd into a Cornprornisc. In tcrms of the scttlement, marriage betwecn the Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent No. 2/Cornplainant has been dissolved by a dccree of divorce bv mutual consent. As full and final settlemcnt of all the clairns of the Itespondent No. 2, the Petitioner No. t has to pay t25 lakhs W.P.(CRL) 1484/2011 Page 1 oJ'2 out of which {16.50 lakhs have already been paid to her and t8.50 lakhs have been paid today vide Pay Order No. 005305 dated Btr' November, 2011 drawn on IDIII Bank, Ashok Vihar, Delhi. She furlher states that in vicw of the settlernent between the patties, she does not want to pul'sue the abovernentioned IrIIt and the proceedings pursuant thereto. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved thcir diffrrenccs of their own fi'ee will, volition and without any coercion and no uscful pulpose will be served in continuance of the procccdings, rathcr thc salne would create further acrimony between thern, it would be in the interest of justice to cluash the abovementioned IiIR and the proceedings pursuant thcreto. Consequently, F'IR No. 10412008 under Sections 498N406134 IPC registerecl at PS CAW Ccll, Nanak Pura, New Delhi and proceedings pursuant thercto are hereby quashed. Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statcments made before this Cout. The pctition is disposed of. Order dasti. ^ NOVEMIIER 09, ZolU',vn', Lo2 *)Y w.P.(cRL) r4v4/2ot t o-asdc' "- 0# hA\r2 W'!ne MUKTA GUI'TA. J. K.J "vfu V-+tnAh ?*^")r, A4A ;;*{". ) ttu tf,*a^/e :S+rjhrrio*er"'o'\ ,f , t,/ k, {t: J,&,fifil d*- I T:/26/ tlwrnrt'ao.DfurClUOV
Case details
Parties and counsel
F 3s# $- * IN THE HIGH COURT + w.P.(cRL) 1484/2011 PANKAJ GOI]I, Through: OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ..... Petitioncr Ms.'I'ania Singh, Advocatc. ..... Itcspondents VCTSUS STATII OIT NC'I'OII DELIII & ANI{ Through: Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP with Inspector Seema Singh, PS CWC, Nanak Pura. Mr. Rajeev Aggarwal, Advocate for I{espondent No. 2 with Rcspondent No. 2 in pcrson. COITAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.