Sanjay Rawat & Ors v. State & Anr

ORDER .08.11.2011 The petitioner is present with counsel. Complainant is also present in person. This is a petition under Sec. 482 of CrPC seeking quashing of FIR No. 384/2010 under Sec. 498-A/406/34 IPC PS Sultan Puri, Delhi on account of settlement arrived at between the petitioner and respondent No.2. The parties have got divorce by decree of mutual consent. The settled amount of Rs.1,15,000/- admittedly, has been received by respondent No.2 from the petitioner. There is no issue out of the wedlock. RespondenfVeena Rawat has agreed that she has settled the matter with the petitioner from her own free will and without any force, Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. coercion, influence or threat. In view of the above, no useful purpose will be served to continue with the FIR No. 384/2010 under Sec. 498-A/406/34 IPC PS Sultan Puri, Delhi. Consequently, the FIR No. 384/2010 under Sec. 498-A/406/34 IPC PS Sultan Puri, Delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. The bail bonds and surety bonds are discharge. The petition stands disposed of. NOVEMBER 08,2011 'raj' . •

-. $-64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3679/2011 SANJAY RAWAT & ORS. Through versus STATE & ANR. Through CORAM: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rama Shanker, Advocate ..... Respondent Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP with ASI Mohinder Kumar 1.0., PS Sultan Puri. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA