- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 8 November 2011
- Bench
- M.L. Mehta
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 3450/2011
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow M.L. Mehta
Judgment
ORDER
08.11.2011 The petitioners are present with the counsel. Respondent Ms. S. Asha is also present. The petitioners are identified by the counsel and the respondent Ms. S. Asha is identified by the 1.0. Parties have arrived at a settlement and respondent S. Asha is living with her husband in the matrimonial house. Respondent S. Asha states that she has settled the matter with the petitioners without any force, coercion, influence or threat ancl out of her free will. She states that she has been living with her husband for the last one year and there is no complaint against the petitioners. In view of the above, no useful purpose will be served to continue with the FIR No. 1072/07 u/s 498-A/406/34 IPC PS Saraswati Vihar, Delhi. Consequently, the FIR No. 1072/07 u/s 498-A/406/34 IPC v Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. -- PS Saraswati Vihar, Delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. The bail bonds and surety bonds are discharge. The petition stands disposed of. NOVEMBER 08,2011 'raj' M.L. MEHTA, J ,
Case details
Parties and counsel
$-3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3450/2011 P RAVI & ORS Through versus STATE & ORS Through CORAM: ..... Petitioner Mr. Handhir Kumar, Advocate ..... Respondent Ms. Kaur, APP for the State HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.