Anand Singh Nayal & Ors v. State & Anr

ORDER

11.11.2011 All the petitioners and the respondent No.2, Hema are present with their respective counsel. This is a petition for quashing of FIR No.18/2010 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at P.S. jahangir Puri. The petitioners are identified by their counsel and respondent No.2 by her counsel. The petitioner No.1, Anand Singh Nayal was married with respondent No.2, Hema. Due to the matrimonial discord, however the matter had been settled between the in the Mediation Centre at Rohini District Courts. In pursuance of settlement, their marriage was dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent under Section 13-8(2) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 w.e.f. 17th September, 2011. As per the settlement, Rs.l.OO lakh :.•; _, -, i .-! L,_._ ' I' ,-Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. ---------has already been paid by the petitioner to respondent No.2 and Rs.SO,OOO/-is being paid by way of pay order. The respondent No.2, who is present, states that the matter has been settled and now she has not left with any claim or rights of any kind against the petitioner. In view of this, no useful purpose would be served in continuing with the FIR No.03/2007. Consequently, the FIR No.lB/2010 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at P.S. Jahangir Puri and all the proceedings emanating therefrom against all the accused persons are hereby quashed. The petition is disposed of accordingly. Bail bonds be discharged. NOVEMBER 11, 2011 skw M.L. MEHTA,J ) :;··, : ' ' w I ,•-, '·, 'i. I ,-( .. -

.. w:\ $-5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3458/2011 % ANAND SINGH NAYAL & ORS Through : versus STATE & ANR ..... Petitioner Mr. N.S. Negi, Advocate. ..... Respondent Through : Ms. jasbir Kaur, APP for the State Mr. R.K. Bhatia, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA