VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2016 › High Court of Delhi

Sangita Bahl v. Samir Seth & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
16 March 2016
Bench
Joint Registrar (Judicial) Sh. Ashutosh Kumar (Dhjs)author
Case no.
CS(OS) 769/2015

Judgment

O R D E R %

16.03.2016 CS(OS) 769/2015

Learned counsel for plaintiff has drawn my attention to previous order dated 06.11.2015 of Hon'ble Court to submit that inspite of specific directions, neither advance copy of application for condonation of delay vide IA No. 23139/2015 has been supplied nor the cost of Rs. 5000/- was paid by defendant no.1within one week of the said order or even till today. Since the present matter is to be transferred in view of notification no.27187/DHC/Orgl. dated

24.11.2015 to the concerned district court having pecuniary and territorial jurisdiction, therefore, this court has became functus officio and the contention of learned counsel for the plaintiff shall be dealt with by the successor court only. Contd.......2 In view of notification no.27187/DHC/Orgl. dated 24.11.2015, the present matter stands transferred. Parties are directed to appear before the Court of Ld. District Judge, East District, Karkardooma Court Complex, Delhi on 26.08.2016 at 10.00 a.m.

ASHUTOSH KUMAR (DHJS)

JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) MARCH 16, 2016/cd

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 769/2015 SANGITA BAHL ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Praveen Khattar with Ms. Priyank Khattar, Advs. versus SAMIR SETH & ORS ..... Defendants Through Ms. Vasundhara Bhardwaj, Adv. for D-1 CORAM: ASHUTOSH KUMAR (DHJS), JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.