Dabur India Ltd v. Mahindra Prasad & Anr

ORDER %

09.07.2013 lA 10576/2013 (U/o.23 Rule 3 CPO& CS(OS) 2437/2012 This is an applicationunder Order 23 Rule 3 CPC read with Section 151 CPC for recording of the Settlement between the parties and terms of the compromiseare incorporatedin the application. In terms of paragraph 9 of the application, learned counsel for the defendant has handed over a demand draft for a sum of Rs.50,000/- towards token damages to the plaintiff. The applicationis accompaniedby an Affidavit of Mr.B.K.Gupta,Deputy General Manager-Legaland constitutedAttorney of the plaintiffcompanyand Mr.MahavirPrasad/defendantNo.2 proprietorof defendant No.l. In view of the above, there is no impediment in taking the Settlement on record. The Suit is disposedof in terms of the settlementbetweenthe parties,as stated in the application for compromise in paragraph 3 to 10 of IA No.10576/2013. The Suit is decreed in terms of the settlement. No order as to costs. JULY 09,2013 n

JAYANT NATH, J. Signed By:RAM DATT Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + lA No. 10576/2013 in CS(OS) 2437/2012 DABUR INDIA LTD Plaintiff Through Mr.Manish Kr.Mishr^, Adv. versus MAHINDRA PRASAD & ANR Defendant Through Mr.RahulRanjanVerma,Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH