Smt. Vinita Mittal and Others v. Smt. Renu Gupta & Another

Order 23 Rule 3 GPC) This suit for partition stands settled between the parties through Delhi High Court Mediation & Conciliation Centre and this is how this joint application under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC (Ex. C-1) has been filed by the partiesto this suit, which is accompanied by affidavits of respective parties and this applicationalso bears the signaturesof Counsel for the parties.Counselfor the Plaintiffpoints out that this application C.S.(OS]No.l751/2()07~ ^ Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. j deserves to be allowed and the suit ought to be decreed in terms of para 4 of this application. Upon perusal of the record, this Court finds no impedimentin allowing this application.Consequentially,this applicationis allowed and suit is decreed in terms of para 4 of this application. Decree sheet be prepared forthwith. This suit and the application are accordingly disposed of. November 15, 2010 pkb C.S. [OS] No. 1751/2007 il Gaur, J. Page 2

A-30 % 15.11.2010 Present: Mr. Rahul Gupta and Mr. Deepak Sahni, Advocates for Plaintiffs with Plaintiff No.2 in person. Mr. Arun Aggarwal,Advocatefor Defendantswith Defendant No. 1 - Renu Gupta in person. +I.A. No. 15241/201Q (under Order 32 Ruie 6 & 7 CPC) in C.S. (OS) No. 1751/2007 * Upon notice, Counsel for the Plaintiff has no objectionto this application,which is accompaniedby affidavit of Defendant No. 1. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b) of this application, Defendant No. 1 is permitted to represent Defendant No. 2 in these proceedings. j This l.A. stands disposed of. + C.S. (OS) No. 1751/2007. LA. No. 15240/2010 (under