VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2016 › High Court of Delhi

Connaught Plaza Restaurants Pvt Ltd v. Capital Boot House

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
4 November 2016
Bench
S. Muralidharauthor
Case no.
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 129/2016

Judgment

O R D E R %

04.11.2016

IA No. /2016 (to be numbered)

¶1Mr. Harish Malhotra, learned Senior counsel appearing for the Petitioner produces a copy of the joint application under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC filed by the both the parties and supported by their respective affidavits. The application is taken on record.

¶2The Registry is directed to register and give number to this application.

¶3It is seen that the compromise/settlement has been arrived at between the parties and they have executed a Settlement Deed dated 3rd November 2016. Accordingly, this application is allowed and the Settlement Deed is taken on O.M.P. (I) (COMM) 129 of 2016

record. It shall be form part of the present order. The parties are bound by the terms and settlement of the Settlement Deed dated 3rd November 2016.

¶4The application is disposed of.

OMP (I) (COMM) 129/29016 & IAs 18858/2015, 8257/2016

¶5The petition is disposed in terms of the Settlement Deed dated 3rd November 2016. The pending applications also stand disposed of.

S.MURALIDHAR, J NOVEMBER 04, 2016 RM

O.M.P. (I) (COMM) 129 of 2016

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 129/2016 IAs 18858/2015, 8257/2016 CONNAUGHT PLAZA RESTAURANTS PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Harish Malhotra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dhruv Kapur and Mr. Siddharth Bhatia, Advocates. versus CAPITAL BOOT HOUSE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav with Ms. Ruchira V. Arora, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.