- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 9 November 2011
- Bench
- Mukta Gupta
- Case no.
- W.P.(CRL) 1184/2011
Judgment
ORDER
09.11.2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 312/2009 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS Burari, New Delhi. The complainant/Respondent No.2 Ms. Vandana is present in person r and is identified by her counsel and investigating officer. She states that the Petitioners and Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise. In terms of the settlement, marriage between the Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent No. 2/complainant has been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent on 31st August, 2010. As part of full and final settlement of all the claims of the Respondent No.2, the Petitioner No. 1 has paid out of which have already been paid to her and remaining have been paid in cash in Court today. She further states that in view of the settlement between the parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question. Consequently, FIR No. 312/2009 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS Burari, New Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. Parties have signed this order sheet m acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court. The petition is disposed of. Order dasti. <en/ D-2-19 /94
Case details
Parties and counsel
,, __ _ * + 0/o IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 1184/2011 SUDHIR KUMAR & ORS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Goel, Advocate with Petitioners in person. versus . STATE & ANR ..... Respondent CORAM: Through: Ms. Laxmi Chauhan, proxy counsel for Mr. Pawan Sharma, S.C. for State with SI Jitender Rana. Mr. S.S. Pawar, Advocate for Respondent No.2 with R-2 in person. HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.