- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 9 November 2011
- Bench
- V.K. Shali
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 3019/2011
Judgment
ORDER %
09.11.2011
¶1This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 1002/2006, under Section 498A/406/34 IPG registered by P.S. Uttam Nagar, Delhi. The ground for quashing of the FIR is that the petitioner no. 1 and the respondent no.2 have settled all their matrimonial disputes and they have filed their respective affidavit.. In addition to this, petitioner nos. 2 to 10 are present in Court and they have been duly identified by their respective counsel except the petitioner no.4, 5 and 7. The petitioner no. 4 has stated to be expired and the petitioner nos. 5 and 7 are stated to be bed ridden. An amount of ?1 lakh has been paid by the petitioners to the respondent no. 2 today in Court. The respondent no. 2 is present in Court and is duly identified by the 10.
¶2Keeping in view the fact that this is a matrimonial dispute which Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. has been settled by the parties, I feel that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the FIR alive.
¶3Accordingly, FIR No. 1002/2006, under Section 498A/406/34 IPG registered by P.S. Uttam Nagar, Delhi and the consequent proceedings which are pending in the competent Court are quashed. NOVEMBER 09, 2011 KP V.K. SHALI,J >
Case details
Parties and counsel
'K r/ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRLM.C. 3019/2011 JITENDER MOHAN & ORS Petitioners Through: Mr. Jagdeep Vats, Adv. versus STATE & ORS Respondents Through; Mr. Navin Sharma, APR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.