- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 8 November 2010
- Bench
- Indermeet Kaur
- Case no.
- RC.REV. 163/2010
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Indermeet Kaur
Judgment
+ "j
¶28% 08.11.2010 Present: . Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Navesh Gupta, Advocate along with petitioner in person. Mr. Pawan Mathur, Advocate for respondent. Counsel for the petitioner: states that the petitioner is not pressing the petition on merits and prays that petitioner be given time of two years to vacate the'premises in question. The respondent is present in person. Under the instructions from the respondent, the counsel for the respondent states that the respondent has no objection in granting time to the petitioner up to
08.11.2012 and the respondent will not execute the eviction order till then. In view of above statement given by the counsel for parties the present petition and pending application stand disposed of. The petitioner is granted time till 08.11 .2012 to vacate the premises in question subject to filing of usual undertaking by the petitioner within two weeks with d copyr to the respondent. ln the meanwhile, the respondent shall not execute the eviction order till the next date of hearing Renotify on 24.IL.2010. The parties to appear in person on ,1, c?' the next date. NOVEMBER 08,2O1O srb trZh,te*l' 6l'4 h/O+r_ Certify that the digital file and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.