Rajesh Mishra v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

CRL.M.C.No.2407/2008

%

Date of decision : 01.08.2008

Rajesh Kumar

….… Petitioner Through: Mr.Swarn Kumar, Advocate along with petitioner in person.

Versus

State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr

......... Respondents Through : Mr.R.N. Vats, APP for State.

Mr.Manjul Kumar Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2 along with respondent No.2 in person.

CORAM :- * HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR

¶1Whether reporters of Local papers may

be allowed to see the judgment?

¶2To be referred to the reporter or not?

¶3Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

ANIL KUMAR, J. *

The petitioner and respondent No.2 are present with their counsel. The learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent No.2 state that the matter has been resolved between the parties and pursuant to the settlement of their disputes, they want to continue having good relations. Petitioner is stated to be a meritorious student and he is stated to be not in a position to continue the proceedings. In

the circumstances, it is contended that no useful purpose shall be served in continuing the proceedings pursuant to FIR No.62/2000, under Sections 342/323/506/34 of Indian Penal Code, P.S.Maurice Nagar.

Considering the facts and circumstances and the fact that the matter has been resolved amicably between the petitioner and respondent No.2 and petitioner being a student and since they have agreed to continue good relations, no useful purpose shall be served in continuing the proceedings pursuant to FIR No.62/2000 under Sections 342/323/506/34 of IPC registered at Police Station Maurice Nagar, Delhi. It shall also be in the interest of justice to quash the said FIR and all the proceedings emanating therefrom.

Consequently, the FIR No.62/2000 under Sections 342/323/506/34 of IPC registered at Police Station Maurice Nagar, Delhi and all the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

The petition is disposed of.

Dasti.

August 1, 2008

ANIL KUMAR, J. 'k'