- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 13 November 2025
- Bench
- Neena Bansal Krishna
- Case no.
- W.P.(CRL) 3956/2024
Judgment
O R D E R %
13.11.2025
¶1Learned counsel for ED submits that the quashing of the ECIR/09/HIU/2019 dated 27.06.2019 was sought on the ground that the FIR for the predicate offence stands quashed. However, the said Order of quashing of the FIR for the predicate offence stands revived by the Order of the Apex Court dated 06.10.2025, copy of which is filed, which be taken on record.
¶2Since, the basic premise of quashing of the FIR is gone, it is submitted that there is no merit in the present Petition.
¶3None is present on behalf of the Petitioner. This is a digitally signed order. 4. The Petition is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J NOVEMBER 13, 2025/va
This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 3956/2024, CRL.M.A. 38233/2024 CRL.M.A. 38235/2024 SUNCITY HI- TECH INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITS AR RITESH CHAUHAN .....Petitioner Through: None. versus DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR MINISTRY OF FINANCE & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Spl. Counsel for ED, Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Panel Counsel for ED, Mr. Kartik Sabharwal, Adv., Mr Rishabh Shukla, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.