- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 12 November 2025
- Bench
- Prathiba M. Singh, Shail Jain
- Case no.
- W.P.(C) 17130/2025
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Prathiba M. SinghFollow Shail Jain
Judgment
O R D E R %
12.11.2025
¶1This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
¶2The present petition challenges the impugned order dated 14th March, 2024 by which a total demand of Rs.4,02,61,846/- has been confirmed against the Petitioner.
¶3The Petitioner has already filed an appeal against the said order on 14th June, 2024. However, it is his grievance that no hearing has been granted and the appeal continues to remain pending.
¶4According to the Petitioner in terms of Section 107(13) of the Goods and Services Act, 2017, the appeal ought to have been adjudicated within one year. Ld. Counsel for the Petitioner submits that in view of the statutory mandate having not been adhered to, the present writ petition has been filed.
¶5Issue notice. Ms. Urvi Mohan, ld. Panel Counsel for the Respondent This is a digitally signed order. Department accepts notice and submits that the appeal is still pending.
¶6Under these circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that the Appellate Authority ought to expeditiously decide the appeal.
¶7Let a personal hearing be given to Petitioner by the Appellate Authority and notice of the same be served at the following e-mail address and mobile number: Email: kgslegalcorpllp@gmail.com Mob. No.: 8700704504
¶8After giving a hearing, the appeal shall be disposed of within two months. Petitioner is at liberty to seek revival of the petition, if the appeal is not disposed of.
¶9The present writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Pending applications are also disposed of.
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
SHAIL JAIN, J. NOVEMBER 12, 2025 jyh/kk/msh This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 17130/2025 M/S ACME INDIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kunwar Gangesh Singh, Mr. Sushmit Chauhan, Ms. Madhulika Singh, Ms. Aarushi Bansal, Ms. Richa Singh & Ms. Ayushi Gupta, Advs. (9643463384) versus DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND TAXES.....Respondent Through: Ms. Urvi Mohan, Adv. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.