VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2009 › High Court of Delhi

Maya & Anr v. Sanjay Ghai & Ors

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
26 October 2009
Bench
Reva Khetrapalauthor
Case no.
MAC.APP. 502/2007

Judgment

JUDGMENT (Oral)

¶1The accident dated 4th July, 2003 resulted in the death of Deep Chand Chauhan. The deceased was survived by his widow, three children and a daughter who filed the claim petition before the learned Tribunal.

¶2The deceased was aged 54 years at the time of the accident and was an agriculturist. The appellants claimed the income of the deceased to be Rs.10,000/- per month. However, the learned Tribunal took the income of the deceased to be Rs.4,500/- per month, deducted 1/3rd towards the personal expenses and applied the multiplier of 8 to compute the loss of dependency at Rs.2,88,000/-. Rs.5,000/- has been awarded towards funeral expenses and Rs.20,000/- towards loss of love and affection. The

total compensation awarded is Rs.3,13,000/-.

¶3The learned counsel for the appellants has urged the following grounds at the time of hearing of this appeal:-

(i) The income of the deceased be taken to be

Rs.10,000/- per month.

(ii) The personal expenses of the deceased be reduced

from 1/3rd to 1/4th.

(iii) The multiplier be enhanced from 8 to 11.

(iv) The compensation be awarded for loss of consortium

and loss of estate.

¶4With respect to the income of the deceased, there is no documentary evidence to prove the income. The learned Tribunal has, therefore, taken the minimum wages into consideration. The learned Tribunal has also taken into consideration the increase in minimum wages to meet the increase in price index and inflation rate. The finding of the learned Tribunal taking the income of the deceased as Rs.4,500/- per month is upheld.

¶5With respect to the multiplier and personal expenses, it is well settled by the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation, 2009

(6) Scale 129 that the appropriate multiplier at the age of 54 years is 11 and the appropriate deduction towards personal expenses where the deceased has left behind 4 to 6 legal representatives is 1/4th.

¶6Following the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the multiplier is enhanced from 8 to 11 and the personal expenses of the deceased are reduced from 1/3rd to 1/4th. Rs.10,000/- is awarded towards loss of consortium and Rs.10,000/- towards loss of estate. Taking the income of the deceased to be Rs.4,500/- per month, deducting 1/4th towards personal expenses and applying the multiplier of 11, the loss of dependency is computed to be Rs.4,45,500/- (Rs.4,500 x 3/4 x 12 x 11). The appellants are entitled to total compensation of Rs.4,90,500/- (Rs.4,45,500 + Rs.5,000 + Rs.20,000 + Rs.10,000 + Rs.10,000).

¶7The appeal is allowed and the award amount is enhanced from Rs.3,13,000/- to Rs.4,90,500/- along with interest @7.5% per annum from the date of filing of petition till realization.

¶8The enhanced award amount along with interest be deposited by respondent No.2 with State Bank of India, Tis Hazari Branch A/c Maya within 30 days through Mr. H.S. Rawat, Relationship Manager, Tis Hazari Branch, Tis Hazari (Mb: 09717044322).

¶9The order with respect to disbursement of enhanced award amount shall be passed after hearing the claimants on the next date of hearing. The claimants are directed to remain present in the Court on the next date of hearing.

¶10List for directions on 7th December, 2009.

J.R. MIDHA, J

OCTOBER 26, 2009

aj

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of decision: 26th October, 2009 MAYA & ANR ..... Appellants Through : Mr. D.D. Singh, Adv. versus SANJAY GHAI & ORS ..... Respondents Through : Ms. Suman Bagga, Adv. CORAM :- THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA 1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.