VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2025 › High Court of Delhi

Rishal & Anr v. The State Govt of NCT Delhi & Anr

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
12 November 2025
Bench
Neena Bansal Krishnaauthor
Case no.
CRL.M.C. 7967/2025

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Neena Bansal Krishna

Judgment

O R D E R %

12.11.2025

¶1Petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the Petitioner seeking quashing of FIR No. 0105/2019 registered under Sections 3/4 of the Delhi Medicare Service Persons & Medicare Service Institutions (Prevension of Violence & Damage to Property) Act IPC at P.S. Civil Lines and all proceedings arising therefrom in terms of the Memorandum of Understanding dated 04.05.2024.

¶2The parties are present in person in the Court and have been identified by their respective Counsel and the Investigating Officer.

¶3According to the FIR, the Petitioners had misbehaved with the Doctor, who was taking care of their relative.

¶4It is submitted that the parties have amicably resolved the dispute vide Memorandum of Understanding dated 04.05.2024. Hence, tt is prayed that the FIR No. 0105/2019 be quashed, in terms of the Settlement. This is a digitally signed order. 5. The parties have endorsed the amicable settlement and accepted the terms thereof voluntarily. The parties have submitted that all the disputes have been amicably settled vide Memorandum of Understanding dated

04.05.2024 and thus, no fruitful purpose will be served in continuing with the FIR.

¶6The present Petition has been signed by the Petitioners and is supported by their Affidavits. The parties have reaffirmed the terms of the settlement arrived at vide Memorandum of Understanding dated 04.05.2024 and they also submit that the said Settlement has been arrived at between the parties, without any pressure and coercion.

¶7In view of the above facts that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will and without any coercion, no useful purpose will be served in continuing with the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. Hence, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.

¶8Moreover, there is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question.

¶9Accordingly, FIR No. FIR No. 0105/2019 registered under Sections 3/4 of the Delhi Medicare Service Persons & Medicare Service Institutions (Prevension of Violence & Damage to Property) Act IPC at P.S. Civil Lines and all other proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

¶10The Petition alongwith pending Application, stands disposed of.

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J NOVEMBER 12, 2025 N This is a digitally signed order.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 7967/2025 & CRL.M.A. 33333/2025 RISHAL & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sunil Dubey, Advocate with Petitioners in person versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State with SI Prince, P.S. Civil Lines Mr. Muzammil, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 through VC CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.