- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 4 November 2011
- Bench
- Mukta Gupta
- Case no.
- CRL.M.C. 2262/2011
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Mukta Gupta
Judgment
ORDER %
04.11.2011 This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 44/2010 under Sections 498A/406/34IPC registered at PS Lodhi Colony,New Delhi. The complainant/RespondentNo. 2 Ms. Sushmais present in person and is identified by her counsel and the InvestigatingOfficer. She states that the Petitioners and Respondent No.2/Complainant have entered into a Compromise.In terms ofthe settlement,marriagebetweenthe PetitionerNo. 1 and RespondentNo. 2/Complainanthas been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent. As full and final settlement of all the claims of the Respondent No. 2, the Petitioner No. 1 has to ?4 lakhs out of which CRL.M.C. 2262/2011 2^ Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing. lalchs have ah-eadybeen paid to her and laldis have been paid todayvide Bankers Cheque No. 470 536 dated 3''' November, 2011 drawn on State Banlc of India. She further states that in view of the settlementbetweenthe parties, she does not want to pursue the abovementionedFIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differencesof their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purposewill be served in continuanceof the proceedings,rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementionedFIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. Consequently,FIR No. 44/2010 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registeredat PS Lodhi Colony,New Delhi and proceedingspursuantthereto are hereby quashed. Parties have signed this order sheet in aclaiowledgment of their statements made before this Court. The petition is disposed of. Order dasti. @ '^MUKTAGUPTA,J. NOVEMBER 04, 201 l/'vn' CRL.M.C. 2262/2011 Page2of2^ jdi h-
Case details
Parties and counsel
23# IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + CRL.M.C. 2262/2011 ANAND TOMAR AND OTHERS Petitioners Through: Mr. Gulab Chandra and Mr. G.M. Farooqui, Advocates with petitioners in person. versus STATE AND ANOTHER Respondents Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP with ASI Kailash, PS Lodhi Colony. Mr. Vivek Singh Bishnoi, Advocate for Respondent No. with Respondent No. 2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.